<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile cache file sizes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/</link>
	<description>Essential knowledge for making your web pages faster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien VDB</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-3389</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien VDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-3389</guid>
		<description>I ran some tests concerning mobile cacheability. 
I noticed that Iphone has only a memory cache which is cleared frequently. Others devices (Android 1.5 and &gt;, WP7, Bada 1.0 &amp;1.2, BB6) seems to well cached ressources even if cache size is small.
You can find results here : http://www.winktoolkit.org/blog/204/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran some tests concerning mobile cacheability.<br />
I noticed that Iphone has only a memory cache which is cleared frequently. Others devices (Android 1.5 and &gt;, WP7, Bada 1.0 &amp;1.2, BB6) seems to well cached ressources even if cache size is small.<br />
You can find results here : <a href="http://www.winktoolkit.org/blog/204/" rel="nofollow">http://www.winktoolkit.org/blog/204/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simeon Potts</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator>Simeon Potts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-3267</guid>
		<description>Abhinav,

Link prefetching is a great idea, until the moment that the browser pre-fetches the &quot;click here to complete purchase&quot; link that you didn&#039;t want to click.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abhinav,</p>
<p>Link prefetching is a great idea, until the moment that the browser pre-fetches the &#8220;click here to complete purchase&#8221; link that you didn&#8217;t want to click.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berwin Malone</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Berwin Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>Great review, this is a concern that involves every smart phone users. Technically speaking, almost all of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, this is a concern that involves every smart phone users. Technically speaking, almost all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Chaplinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Chaplinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>Sent results from iPad, Nokia E90 native browser and Opera Mobile from Nokia E90 :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sent results from iPad, Nokia E90 native browser and Opera Mobile from Nokia E90 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Chaplinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2199</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Chaplinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2199</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve.
Can you update your post with the link to the test via url shortener (like bit.ly), otherwise it&#039;s really painful to type full url on mobile :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve.<br />
Can you update your post with the link to the test via url shortener (like bit.ly), otherwise it&#8217;s really painful to type full url on mobile :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hakanson</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2186</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hakanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2186</guid>
		<description>I also tried Opera Mini 5 on both my BlackBerry Bold 9700 and iPod Touch (running iOS 4).  Both stalled out on the page where &quot;2048 kB WAS read from cache&quot; and &quot;Automatically testing 4096 kB...&quot;, so neither could post results back.  Not sure if the test could timeout on a page to allow reporting back to browserscope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also tried Opera Mini 5 on both my BlackBerry Bold 9700 and iPod Touch (running iOS 4).  Both stalled out on the page where &#8220;2048 kB WAS read from cache&#8221; and &#8220;Automatically testing 4096 kB&#8230;&#8221;, so neither could post results back.  Not sure if the test could timeout on a page to allow reporting back to browserscope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Hakanson</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Hakanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 13:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>I tried the test on my BlackBerry Bold 9700 (running the 5.0 OS), and I get a &quot;HTTP Error 413: Request Entity Too Large&quot; when I click &quot;Run the Test.&quot;  Can you put a smaller initial size?  I think the BlackBerry may have a 128k limit for a request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the test on my BlackBerry Bold 9700 (running the 5.0 OS), and I get a &#8220;HTTP Error 413: Request Entity Too Large&#8221; when I click &#8220;Run the Test.&#8221;  Can you put a smaller initial size?  I think the BlackBerry may have a 128k limit for a request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhinav</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/07/12/mobile-cache-file-sizes/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhinav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=1385#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Seems like there is only one browser that does link pre-fetching.

Pre-fetching data opportunistically (through faster/cheaper networks aka WiFi) could yield a big performance improvement for mobile browsing. There is also the advantage of using less cellular data and thus reducing operator costs as well as avoiding slower wireless links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Seems like there is only one browser that does link pre-fetching.</p>
<p>Pre-fetching data opportunistically (through faster/cheaper networks aka WiFi) could yield a big performance improvement for mobile browsing. There is also the advantage of using less cellular data and thus reducing operator costs as well as avoiding slower wireless links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

