<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jQuery 1.4 performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/</link>
	<description>Essential knowledge for making your web pages faster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 09:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using jQuery</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>Using jQuery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=814#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>using a minified version of jQuery def makes a big difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>using a minified version of jQuery def makes a big difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Chaplinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/#comment-1523</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Chaplinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=814#comment-1523</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve.

I performed series of tests on our merges (25 JS files of different size and content) with and without gzip.

Average benefit of closure compiler over YUI for non-gzipped files is 3.04% (0.7%-7.77%), and 2.64% (0.15%-6.52%) for gzipped ones.

Not so big difference :(

I can share spreadsheet, if somebody needs it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve.</p>
<p>I performed series of tests on our merges (25 JS files of different size and content) with and without gzip.</p>
<p>Average benefit of closure compiler over YUI for non-gzipped files is 3.04% (0.7%-7.77%), and 2.64% (0.15%-6.52%) for gzipped ones.</p>
<p>Not so big difference :(</p>
<p>I can share spreadsheet, if somebody needs it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=814#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Closure Compiler Advanced mode will never be &quot;safe&quot; if you expect to use without changing your code.  It gets its size wins by requiring more information than the raw javascript code (all external referenced must be declared in &quot;extern&quot; files and all internally declared names referenced externally must be &quot;exported&quot;.  If you invest the time to do this the wins can be massive, 85% or more if you are working with a large library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closure Compiler Advanced mode will never be &#8220;safe&#8221; if you expect to use without changing your code.  It gets its size wins by requiring more information than the raw javascript code (all external referenced must be declared in &#8220;extern&#8221; files and all internally declared names referenced externally must be &#8220;exported&#8221;.  If you invest the time to do this the wins can be massive, 85% or more if you are working with a large library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoimen</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>stoimen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=814#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

after reading this post I was amazed to hear about Google Closure Compiler and start doing some tests right away. In the project I&#039;m working on I use both jQuery and OpenLayers javascript libraries. The resulting .js file is really huge and I used YUI Compressor to compress it. The good news is that with the advanced mode turned on Google Closure manage to compress it even more resulting in more than 50% of savings from the original file and with more than 100K more than YUI. The bad news is that this code isn&#039;t working. As it&#039;s well known Closure Compiler is not save in advanced mode and I&#039;m waiting until this happens! Then GCC will be probably the best tool to minify/compress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>after reading this post I was amazed to hear about Google Closure Compiler and start doing some tests right away. In the project I&#8217;m working on I use both jQuery and OpenLayers javascript libraries. The resulting .js file is really huge and I used YUI Compressor to compress it. The good news is that with the advanced mode turned on Google Closure manage to compress it even more resulting in more than 50% of savings from the original file and with more than 100K more than YUI. The bad news is that this code isn&#8217;t working. As it&#8217;s well known Closure Compiler is not save in advanced mode and I&#8217;m waiting until this happens! Then GCC will be probably the best tool to minify/compress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Schechter</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2010/01/15/jquery-14-performance/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Schechter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/?p=814#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t use either compiler at Amazon(not that I haven&#039;t tried to convince them otherwise).  Using Closure Compiler I saw on average a 10.4% savings gzipped as opposed to 4.6% with YUI Compressor.
My Data: http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tcQVvzrVDhnT33MxfA3UZow&amp;output=html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t use either compiler at Amazon(not that I haven&#8217;t tried to convince them otherwise).  Using Closure Compiler I saw on average a 10.4% savings gzipped as opposed to 4.6% with YUI Compressor.<br />
My Data: <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tcQVvzrVDhnT33MxfA3UZow&#038;output=html" rel="nofollow">http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tcQVvzrVDhnT33MxfA3UZow&#038;output=html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

